ViciBox v9.0.0 AMI login failure for Asterisk 13

Hello
Running ViciBox 9.0.0, Vici Version: 2.14b0.5 SVN 3179; Updated Asterisk from 13.27.0-vici to 13.27.1-vici. - so all the latest you can get.
The AST_manager_listen.pl screen ran, but did not connect to Asterisk AMI. Gave error "manager.c: [] == Client from 127.0.0.1, failed to authenticate in 30 seconds"
Did manual telnet from command line:
# telnet localhost 5038
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
Asterisk Call Manager/2.10.5
Looks like telnet is waiting for a version that ends in a 0,1,2 or 3 (at the end of the line) for these 2 Perl scripts:
AST_manager_listen.pl: $tn->waitfor('/[0123]\n$/'); # print login
AST_update.pl: $t->waitfor('/[0123]\n$/'); # print login
I changed the line to this (which is how it is in the other Perl scripts) and it worked:
$tn->waitfor('/Asterisk Call Manager\//');
I don't know when the AMI_VERSION changed - but seems like it was at least 3 years ago. Don't understand how Vici has worked on Asterisk 13 with this code. Does this need a bug fix, or have we gotten the wrong version of something running??
Thanks
Roger
Running ViciBox 9.0.0, Vici Version: 2.14b0.5 SVN 3179; Updated Asterisk from 13.27.0-vici to 13.27.1-vici. - so all the latest you can get.
The AST_manager_listen.pl screen ran, but did not connect to Asterisk AMI. Gave error "manager.c: [] == Client from 127.0.0.1, failed to authenticate in 30 seconds"
Did manual telnet from command line:
# telnet localhost 5038
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
Asterisk Call Manager/2.10.5
Looks like telnet is waiting for a version that ends in a 0,1,2 or 3 (at the end of the line) for these 2 Perl scripts:
AST_manager_listen.pl: $tn->waitfor('/[0123]\n$/'); # print login
AST_update.pl: $t->waitfor('/[0123]\n$/'); # print login
I changed the line to this (which is how it is in the other Perl scripts) and it worked:
$tn->waitfor('/Asterisk Call Manager\//');
I don't know when the AMI_VERSION changed - but seems like it was at least 3 years ago. Don't understand how Vici has worked on Asterisk 13 with this code. Does this need a bug fix, or have we gotten the wrong version of something running??
Thanks
Roger