Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N
mcargile wrote:So far no crashes, but the load on the server is quite high. A quad core with four gigs of ram is having load spikes as high as 15.
ps -eo pcpu,pid,user,args | sort -k 1 -r | head -11
mflorell wrote:I'm not sure exactly what the output from that means, but what I can see is that "asterisk" is right at the top by far.
mflorell wrote:We've experienced loads similar to those with Asterisk 1.8. There really doesn't seem to be much difference in overall performance actually. We're on our third build of Asterisk 11 in production at the moment, we've been running them in production since August. At peak loads, we are putting about 8,000 calls per hour per server through them. The latest server running Asterisk 11 that we put into production is a direct vicibox 7.01 install, and it has been running just fine for about a week.
mflorell wrote:We are on Asterisk v.11.20.0 at this point, we just used the source from Asterisk and the patches listed above, and that's the package that's included with Vicibox 7.01.
mflorell wrote:We haven't done any testing on that yet, it's not a common feature for our clients. The 1.8 patch might actually work just fine with it.
mflorell wrote:I'll see if I can find it and post it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests